Latest News, Local News, International News, US Politics, Economy

Google’s $8 Billion Deal: Securing Default App Status on Samsung Devices

The Epic Games Inc. vs. Google courtroom clash revealed a lucrative deal: Google secured default app placement on Samsung phones.

A hefty $8 billion pact over four years, disclosed through James Kolotouros’ testimony, solidifies Google’s apps as the go-to choice for Samsung mobile devices, igniting discussions on antitrust violations and monopolistic practices.

Google’s Alleged Obstruction

The core of Epic’s legal action against Google is the claim that Google’s practices regarding its app store, Google Play, violate antitrust laws. 

Epic contends that Google deliberately obstructed third-party app stores on Samsung devices to safeguard its own profits from Google Play. Kolotouros’ testimony exposed the dependency of Google Play’s revenue, with a significant portion stemming from Samsung devices, potentially signifying a monopolistic stronghold.

Central to Epic’s argument is the assertion that Google’s dominance over Android apps creates an unlawful monopoly, enabling them to enforce hefty commissions ranging from 15 to 30 percent on in-app purchases. Google, however, asserts it’s competing with Apple and its app store, attempting to counter Epic’s monopoly claims.

Read more: Top 5 Must-Visit US Destinations For 2023 Adventurous Travelers

Future of App Marketplaces at Stake

The Epic Games Inc. vs. Google courtroom clash revealed a lucrative deal: Google secured default app placement on Samsung phones.


This courtroom saga unveils the interconnected web between tech giants. Google’s defense, citing competition from Apple, contrasts sharply with recent legal entanglements involving both companies in an antitrust lawsuit. This case centers on Google’s payments to Apple to secure its search engine as the default on iPhones.

Amidst allegations of bullying and stifling competition, Google initially proposed a $200 million deal to integrate Samsung’s Galaxy app store within Google Play, a plan ultimately scrapped for the current monumental $8 billion arrangement.

Kolotouros underscored the significance of Google-affiliated apps pre-installed on Samsung phones, arguing that their absence might steer consumers toward Apple’s iPhones.

As the trial unfolds in the Northern District of California, the tech industry awaits the outcome of this high-stakes legal duel, anticipating potential ramifications for the future of app marketplaces and the competitive landscape in the smartphone industry. 

Scheduled to conclude by year-end, this trial holds the potential to reshape the dynamics of app distribution and dominance in the smartphone sphere.

Read more: HealthTech Advancements: How Technology Is Transforming Healthcare

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.